<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obedience, Sovereignty and Covenant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sermonrant.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/obedience-sovereignty-and-covenant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sermonrant.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/obedience-sovereignty-and-covenant/</link>
	<description>"Discovering the truth, one dialogue at a time"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:14:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sermonrant</title>
		<link>http://sermonrant.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/obedience-sovereignty-and-covenant/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>sermonrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sermonrant.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/obedience-sovereignty-and-covenant/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Someone asked me after church re: my point that circumcision, which is done on the male organ was a sign to Abraham that this promise of a son (And subsequent nations, seed, etc.) was not an act of human will and ability, but God&#039;s doing, &quot;wasn&#039;t Abraham actually virile, since he impregnated Hagar, and his other wife after Sarah?&quot; The main point here is that circumcision was a custom used in this part of the world for many years, and God used the custom as a symbol to indicate that it is not man (Mankind) who brings forth this promise and life, it is God. So my point wasn&#039;t necessarily the male, but emphasizing God&#039;s sovereignty in the execution of His promises to Abraham, much like He does with us to this day through Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone asked me after church re: my point that circumcision, which is done on the male organ was a sign to Abraham that this promise of a son (And subsequent nations, seed, etc.) was not an act of human will and ability, but God&#8217;s doing, &#8220;wasn&#8217;t Abraham actually virile, since he impregnated Hagar, and his other wife after Sarah?&#8221; The main point here is that circumcision was a custom used in this part of the world for many years, and God used the custom as a symbol to indicate that it is not man (Mankind) who brings forth this promise and life, it is God. So my point wasn&#8217;t necessarily the male, but emphasizing God&#8217;s sovereignty in the execution of His promises to Abraham, much like He does with us to this day through Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
