<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Resurrection of Hope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sermonrant.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/a-resurrection-of-hope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sermonrant.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/a-resurrection-of-hope/</link>
	<description>"Discovering the truth, one dialogue at a time"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:14:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sermonrant</title>
		<link>http://sermonrant.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/a-resurrection-of-hope/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>sermonrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sermonrant.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/a-resurrection-of-hope/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Well said, thanks John!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, thanks John!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Prince</title>
		<link>http://sermonrant.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/a-resurrection-of-hope/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>John Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sermonrant.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/a-resurrection-of-hope/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the harmony of the resurrection accounts, it is something I haven&#039;t given as much thought to. It makes total sense the way you have harmonized these accounts. I wanted to comment on the question you asked about the importance of the Cross in Christ&#039;s message. I would say that Christ&#039;s message can only be understood in light of the cross and the ressurection. Christ is always touted as a good moral teacher by people who probably haven&#039;t read His teaching. His teaching and claims make Him sound like a lunatic, if he hadn&#039;t risen from the dead. He wasn&#039;t claiming to be a good moral teacher he was claiming, I am God. The only reason his teaching survives and is proclaimed worldwide is becuase of his life, death, and ressurection, which constitute the crux of His message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the harmony of the resurrection accounts, it is something I haven&#8217;t given as much thought to. It makes total sense the way you have harmonized these accounts. I wanted to comment on the question you asked about the importance of the Cross in Christ&#8217;s message. I would say that Christ&#8217;s message can only be understood in light of the cross and the ressurection. Christ is always touted as a good moral teacher by people who probably haven&#8217;t read His teaching. His teaching and claims make Him sound like a lunatic, if he hadn&#8217;t risen from the dead. He wasn&#8217;t claiming to be a good moral teacher he was claiming, I am God. The only reason his teaching survives and is proclaimed worldwide is becuase of his life, death, and ressurection, which constitute the crux of His message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
